No, I’m not. Since hitting the issue of not being able to store the user data outside of the container, I didn’t try it again. Now running it on a Linode VPS.

This is the toolbar I'm referring to, shown in 20.1:

Hi Caitlin, 

Thanks. Yes, sorry, I think that's what I meant, "server", not "host". I currently use the ScreenConnect Mac installer to run the ScreenConnect server on my iMac running macOS 10.14, which I believe won't be possible from October, and would love to run it from my Synology NAS instead, either via Docker or natively.

James

Would it be possible to have an update on whether this is likely to be in place by October, when Mac host support is being discontinued?

As if it's not, those currently using the Mac host could do with knowing now so that we can look into alternatives. Thanks. 

It's already live. See above comment and take a look in the App Store.

Now that "Control" is dropping support for macOS next year, it would be great if you could provide Synology (or Docker) support to give those currently using Macs a viable alternative.

It was https://hub.docker.com/r/kenayagi/screenconnect/ that I used, seem to get up and running ok, but admittedly didn't test everything. It was running with the files outside of the container that I had problems with, could only get it to work with the files inside the container (otherwise it couldn't find mono). May be possible if you individually link each folder, apart from App_Runtime.

That's a shame, was hoping I'd be able to migrate my SC install over to my Synology by running it in Docker. Would be interested to hear what issues you came across? As I seemed to be able to easily get a basic install of SC up and running in Docker ok (just couldn't get the data to be on a mounted volume).

This is a feature of iOS 11, due next month. Can we look forward to CW Control support? 

https://sixcolors.com/link/2017/08/screen-sharing-coming-with-ios-11/